On Monday, Bob took a little dig at Democratic Presidential Candidate John Edwards by saying that he has a really big house and that he is the richest of all presidential candidates. I'm guessing that Bob was implying that since Sen. Edwards has achieved success, he is somehow not suitable to be President of the United States. Or maybe Bob was implying that Sen. Edwards is somehow hypocritical since he champions the poor. I don't know, I've stopped trying to understand Bob long ago.
But, if it's wrong to be rich, like Bob implies, then what does that say about George W. Bush and Dick Cheney? After all, Bush had assets estimated at $20.9 million in 2005, including his Texas ranch, worth as much as $5 million. Cheney's assets were estimated at $94.6 million.
Did anybody hear Bob make a dig at George and Dick over their wealth? Anyone?
No comments:
Post a Comment